MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412965848 · doi:10.1109/ur65550.2025.11078056

Inception CNN-Transformer for Robust PPG-to-ECG Reconstruction

2025· article· en· W4412965848 on OpenAlexaff
Sung Woo Kim, Jae Young Lee, Jong‐Suk Kim, Junmo Kim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransformerArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, wearable healthcare devices and robots have become increasingly crucial in the face of population aging and the rising prevalence of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, which remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. These conditions amplified the demand for advanced, continuous monitoring of cardiovascular health. While electrocardiogram (ECG) signals offer comprehensive diagnostic insights, their reliance on multiple electrodes often limits practicality. In contrast, photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals are more convenient to acquire but lack the rich detail of ECG. In this paper, we propose a novel PPG-to-ECG reconstruction method that combines an Inception CNN for multiscale feature extraction with a Transformer architecture for capturing global dependencies. Our proposed method achieves robust ECG signal reconstruction even under high-noise conditions by effectively preserving local morphological details and leveraging long-range contextual information. We validate the proposed approach on diverse datasets spanning everyday life and intensive care unit (ICU) settings, demonstrating high accuracy and generalizability. Experimental results indicate an RMSE of 0.26, corresponding to a 10% improvement over state-of-the-art methods. These findings highlight the feasibility of reliable, real-time ECG reconstruction from PPG signals alone, paving the way for scalable and accessible healthcare monitoring solutions in clinical and wearable contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207