MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412974038 · doi:10.7202/1118759ar

Étude de la réception de <i>Christa</i>

2025· article· fr· W4412974038 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and Literary Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Christa , une sculpture réalisée par Edwina Sandy en 1975, présente une femme en croix. De retour en 2016 dans une des chapelles de la cathédrale épiscopale St-John the Divine à New York, après la controverse de 1984 où elle avait dû être censurée, cette oeuvre a permis d’interroger l’incarnation, la crucifixion, la représentation de la rédemption dans la tradition chrétienne. Quels changements peuvent expliquer la plus récente acceptation de sa présence dans un tel lieu? Pour répondre à cette question, l’autrice, dans son article, présente une brève histoire de la réception de Christa à travers certains écrits féministes, lesquels mettent en lumière diverses contributions relatives aux questions susmentionnées. De la sorte, elle démontre comment le travestissement du Christ suggéré par Sandy a été compris, tant par ses détracteurs que par celles et ceux l’ayant accueilli avec enthousiasme, voire amené plus loin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it