MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412974356 · doi:10.1121/10.0037913

Bayesian matched-field inversion for shear and compressional geoacoustic profiles at the New England Mud Patch

2025· article· en· W4412974356 on OpenAlexaff
Stan E. Dosso, Preston S. Wilson, David P. Knobles, Julien Bonnel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttenuationGeologyShear (geology)Longitudinal waveAcousticsWave propagationOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper estimates depth-dependent profiles of shear- and compressional-wave geoacoustic properties for seabed sediments at the New England Mud Patch through matched-field inversion of broadband (20-2000 Hz) acoustic data recorded at a 14-element vertical line array due to a combustive sound source. Trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion is applied to sample probabilistically over the number of seabed layers and corresponding layer depths and geoacoustic properties, as well as over the order and parameters of an autoregressive error model. This approach, based on a parallel-tempering implementation of birth/death reversible-jump Markov-chain Monte Carlo sampling, combines objective, data-driven model selection and quantitative parameter/uncertainty estimation. Results indicate low shear-wave speeds (∼30 m/s) with small uncertainties over most of the upper mud layer, increasing in underlying transition and sand layers, with values in good agreement with in situ probe measurements (for the mud) and nominal values (for sand). The compressional-wave attenuation profile is well estimated but shear-wave attenuation is poorly constrained. Comparison of results for inversions both with and without shear-wave parameters and consideration of inter-parameter correlations indicate that estimates of compressional-wave parameters, including attenuation, are not substantially influenced by shear-wave effects, with the possible exception of the sand layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207