MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412975237 · doi:10.1121/10.0037643

Wind-generated ambient noise in the deep ocean trenches

2025· article· en· W4412975237 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Buckingham, David R. Barclay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbient noise levelGeologyTrenchNeutral buoyancyNoise (video)Sound (geography)AcousticsBuoyancyDeep seaOceanographyComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the influence of the wind, breaking waves create bubbles, which oscillate as monopoles thus acting as efficient sources of sound. In the deep ocean trenches, bottom reflections are often negligible and the bubble-generated ambient noise is primarily downward traveling. The Deep Sound instrument platform is designed to record the noise on pairs of hydrophones, aligned vertically and horizontally, to depths as great as 11 000 m. Deep Sound consists of a Vitrovex glass sphere, three recovery antennas, a high-performance data acquisition system, inertial navigation, and a CTD plus sound speed sensor, with power provided by lithium-ion batteries. It descends under gravity, and releases a drop weight at depth, at which point it returns to the surface under buoyancy, collecting sound speed and acoustic data on the descent and ascent. Deep Sound has been deployed in the Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench, the Tonga Trench, the Sirena Deep, and the Philippine Sea. One of the conclusions from the data is that the noise field in the deep trenches conforms to the simple Cron and Sherman theoretical model provided that the local sound speed is used in the computation of the spatial coherence of the noise. [Research supported by ONR.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207