MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412975548 · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03774

Circulating microbiome DNA in Southern Ocean seabirds: A novel tool for disease surveillance in polar ecosystems

2025· article· en· W4412975548 on OpenAlexafffund
Sophia Ferchiou, Amira Tounsi, Fanny Fronton, France Caza, Mathilde Lejeune, J Tornos, Thierry Boulinier, Yves St‐Pierre

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Conservation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrobiomeEcosystemMarine ecosystemEnvironmental DNAGeographyEcologyBiodiversityBiologyEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marine ecosystems, particularly in polar regions, are undergoing rapid transformations due to climate change, influencing host-pathogen dynamics in wildlife populations. Seabirds, which form spatially structured social networks, serve as potential sentinels for pathogen surveillance, yet the composition and variability of their blood microbiome remain largely unexplored. The concept of a circulating blood microbiome is relatively new and debated as blood has traditionally been considered sterile. However, emerging evidence suggests that circulating microbial DNA (cmDNA) represents a transient microbial signature, potentially offering insights into host health, dysbiosis, and disease risks. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and relevance of circulating microbial DNA (cmDNA) as a tool for pathogen surveillance in wild seabird populations. We identified inter-annual variability, sex-related, and age-related variability in blood microbiome composition, with core microbial signatures differing across sites and time periods. We also observed sex-biased microbial prevalence and age-related microbiome maturation, with dynamic shifts in diversity across chick developmental stages. Finally, we detected several potential pathogens, providing new insights into their distribution, prevalence, and potential implications for seabird health. These findings highlight the value of cmDNA analysis as an effective approach for wildlife disease surveillance and pathogen monitoring in polar ecosystems, contributing to broader efforts in marine conservation and biosecurity in the face of climate change-driven environmental shifts. • Circulating microbial DNA enables minimally invasive wildlife disease surveillance. • Core microbial signatures vary across sites, time periods, and host traits. • Microbial diversity shifts dynamically during chick development. • Potential pathogens detected may have implications for seabird health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Ecology and ConservationSame topicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207