MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412979833 · doi:10.1016/j.gloei.2025.07.003

Renewable energy finance, policy, and building energy technologies: trends, case studies, and innovations in North America

2025· article· en· W4412979833 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Energy Interconnection · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy Efficiency and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGreen Municipal Fund
KeywordsRenewable energyEnergy engineeringNatural resource economicsEnergy policyEconomicsFeed-in tariffBusinessEnvironmental economicsFinanceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes North American shifts in renewable energy finance and building energy technologies from 2022 to 2025. Fueled by net-zero targets and policy incentives, clean energy investment now surpasses fossil fuel spending. We examine key financial tools—green bonds, corporate power purchase agreements (PPAs), public–private partnerships, and tax credits—and parallel advances in smart meters, grid-interactive efficient buildings, battery storage, heat pumps, and net-zero construction. Through case studies of municipal retrofit financing, integrated smart homes, and net-zero campuses, we illustrate emerging finance–technology–policy ecosystems poised to accelerate the energy transition and bolster climate resilience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it