MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412979836 · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2025.105207

Non-destructive testing techniques (NDTTs) for microbial contamination in cheese: A review

2025· review· en· W4412979836 on OpenAlexafffund
P. Meenakshi, Smriti Chaturvedi, Annamalai Manickavasagan

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Food Science & Technology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsContaminationEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryFood scienceBiochemical engineeringBiologyChemistryEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: Background As per the World Health Organisation, about 600 million cases of foodborne illness and 420,000 fatalities happen every year due to the consumption of food contaminated with microorganisms or chemicals. In cheese production, microbiological contamination poses a significant challenge at every stage of processing, from raw milk collection to ripening. Pathogens and spoilage microbes namely Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium butyricum, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus spp., and Penicillium spp. can invade cheese despite its acidic or saline nature. Hence, timely detection of such microbes is essential to ensure safety for consumer consumption. Traditional microbiological testing methods such as culture-based techniques are time-consuming due to longer incubation duration. On the contrary, advanced detection methods like nucleic acid-based techniques (PCR), immunological techniques like ELISA, and liquid chromatography provide rapid results but require expensive equipment and skilled personnel. Scope and approach Recent emerging non-destructive testing techniques (NDTTs) like hyperspectral imaging, spectroscopic methods (Near Infrared, FTIR, fluorescence, and Surface enhanced Raman), and electronic-nose (E-nose) have been widely used for quick detection of microbial contaminants in cheese, without physically altering or damaging the sample. Moreover, they have high accuracy, sensitivity and proven potential to differentiate microbial species in cheese samples. Key findings and conclusion The integration of spectroscopy with chemometrics resulted in an acceptable correlation coefficient of 0.89-0.96. This review summarizes the existing application of various conventional methods and NDTTs in cheese microbial detection. Furthermore, this study also highlights the merits and demerits of NDTTs. The utilization of suitable NDTT along with chemometrics could help in real-time monitoring of microbial contaminants in the cheese industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrends in Food Science & TechnologySame topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207