MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412981423 · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2025.121391

Radiation-induced modifications in ZrN: effect of micro vs. nano crystallites

2025· article· en· W4412981423 on OpenAlexafffund
C.F. Beer, Mounib Bahri, Gianguido Baldinozzi, Manabu Ishimaru, Yanwen Zhang, Matthew K. Sharpe, Callum D. McAleese, Xinyue Chen, Fábio Rocha Bohns, Troy D. Manning, Nigel D. Browning, Karl R. Whittle, R. Springell, Riaz Akhtar, Maulik Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Materialia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear materials and radiation effects
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaUniversity of SheffieldUniversity of LiverpoolHenry Royce Institute
KeywordsMaterials scienceCrystalliteNano-MetallurgyRadiationComposite materialNanotechnologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ZrN is a model system used to understand the irradiation response of isostructural advanced nuclear fuel, UN. UN possesses desirable material properties, such as improved thermal conductivity and fissile uranium density compared to oxides, but understanding damage accumulation and recovery processes in its rocksalt structure remains limited. Micro- and nanocrystalline ZrN were studied under ion irradiation using 600 keV Ar + ions with fluences varying from 1 × 10 15 to 1 × 10 17 ions/cm 2 at room temperature. Structural parameters, crystallite size, and microstrain of crystalline phases were determined via a unique Rietveld refinement of glancing incidence XRD data. Transmission electron microscopy was used to investigate microstructural modifications, and nanoindentation was used to explore the evolution of mechanical properties. The results show a pronounced increase in the crystallite size of nanocrystalline ZrN, while induced damage degrades the coherence of scattering domains in both ZrN systems post-irradiation. Microcrystalline ZrN displays swelling with increasing fluence, whereas nanocrystalline ZrN contracts before showing a continued unit cell expansion at higher fluences. AFM was used to confirm swelling in mi-crocrystalline ZrN, while oxidation in nanocrystalline ZrN is explored using ToF-ERDA and is attributed to a radiation-induced REDOX reaction. Nanoindentation results confirmed increases in the post-irradiated surface hardness and elastic modulus. The TEM investigation provides evidence of periodic and incommensurate ordering in irradiated regions of microcrystalline ZrN. The formation of a distinct epitaxial layer of cubic ZrO 2 on the surface of microcrystalline ZrN has been attributed to the effects of incident ion interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa MaterialiaSame topicNuclear materials and radiation effectsFrench-language works237,207