Psychometric network analysis of depression symptoms after a course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients and methods: 12 patients diagnosed with intractable Chronic Cluster Headache, aged from 24 to 60 years, were enrolled in a prospective open study.4 out of 11 failed occipital nerve stimulation(ONS).One patient received ONS 12 months after hypothalamic DBS.A single electrode was laid on the floor of the third ventricle.The number of attacks was collected at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively, then at long term (9-113 months).Besides physical and laboratory monitoring, patients' mood was regularly assessed.Results: This study reports the long term efficacy of third ventricle stimulation in reducing the number of headache attacks: 3/11 patients are pain free or have >80% improvement, 5/11 have >50% improvement, 2/11 show lesser improvement, while 2/11have no significant improvement.Anxiety and Depression scores are also significantly ameliorated.No severe adverse events have been reported so far.Conclusion: This technic could be a surgical alernative when all technics have failed to treat rCH .It has shown efficacy, although it appears to progressively dampen its impact in some patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".