MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412984675 · doi:10.18192/uojm.v15is2.7533

From Diabetes to Weight Loss: The Problems with Semaglutide's Expanded Use

2025· article· en· W4412984675 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
R. Ben Othman

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemaglutideWeight lossDiabetes mellitusMedicineType 2 diabetesEndocrinologyObesityLiraglutide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2018, a semaglutide formulation, Ozempic, was introduced to the Canadian market [1], as a treatment for Type 2 diabetes.By stimulating the release of insulin from the pancreas, semaglutide results in lower blood glucose and body weight, combating symptoms of diabetes [2] Recently, semaglutide-based medications have been the subject of controversy due to their "off-label" use solely for weight loss purposes.Social media and celebrities have popularized the use of semaglutide drugs for weight loss, leading to a dramatic surge in public interest [3].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of MedicineSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207