MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412993381 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade997

Infant Core-collapse Supernovae with Circumstellar Interactions from KMTNet. I. Luminous Transitional Case of KSP-SN-2022c

2025· article· en· W4412993381 on OpenAlexaff
Naomi Jiang, Dae‐Sik Moon, Yuan Qi Ni, M. R. Drout, Hong Soo Park, S. González–Gaitán, Sang Chul Kim, Youngdae Lee, Eddie Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersKorea Astronomy and Space Science Institute
KeywordsPhysicsSupernovaAstrophysicsCore (optical fiber)AstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present BVi multiband high-cadence observations of a Type II supernova (SN) KSP-SN-2022c from a star-forming galaxy at z ≃ 0.041 from its infant to nebular phase. Early light-curve fitting with a single power law is consistent with the first detection roughly 15 minutes after shock breakout (SBO). The SN light curves feature a rapid rise and decline across its luminous (V ≃ –18.41 mag) peak together with a short plateau. The presence of the short plateau and rapid postpeak decline place the SN within a small group of transitional type between Type II-P and II-L subtypes. Its broad and asymmetric H profiles with large emission-to-absorption ratios and its near-peak luminosity in excess of predictions from models of SN shock cooling both point to circumstellar interactions in this SN. Early colour evolution exhibits a short-lived blueward motion in B − V within the first few days and continuous reddening in V − i, inconsistent with simple blackbody heating. Our simulations of SN light curves estimate 13 M ⊙ and 680 R ⊙ for the mass and radius of the progenitor, respectively, together with circumstellar material (CSM) of 0.73 M ⊙ to account for the excess luminosity and rapid postpeak declines. We discuss the origin of its short plateau and early colour evolution in the context of partial envelope stripping of the progenitor star and a delayed SN SBO near the edge of the CSM, respectively, as indicated by our simulations. We establish a correlation between postpeak decline rates and CSM mass in Type II SNe, highlighting that CSM interactions play a major role in shaping the postpeak evolution of transitional types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae→French-language works237,207→