MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412993592 · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2025.1629499

TOPSS: TOlerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in Pediatric Stroke Survivors

2025· article· en· W4412993592 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Stuart Fraser, Anna Clearman, Melika Abrahams, Bernadette T. Gillick, Tia Lal, Sean I. Savitz, Nuray Yozbatıran

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
KeywordsTolerabilityTranscranial direct-current stimulationMedicineHemiparesisBrain stimulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAdverse effectPhysical therapyStroke (engine)NeuromodulationStimulationSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with emerging therapeutic potential in neurodevelopmental conditions. While childhood-onset stroke survivors frequently experience long-term motor impairment, there are very few studies examining the safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in this population. Objective: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation paired with occupational therapy in children and adolescents with chronic hemiparesis following childhood-onset arterial ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage. Methods: In this single-arm, open-label pilot study, five participants aged 6-19 years of age received five daily sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (sham on day 1, then 0.5-1.5 mA) during structured occupational therapy. Safety and tolerability were assessed through side effect questionnaires, pre-and post-stimulation vital signs, and study completion rates. Secondary exploratory outcomes included arm function measures (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity, perceived performance and satisfaction) (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure), and gross manual dexterity (Box and Blocks Test). Results: All participants completed the study with no major adverse events. Mild, self-limited itching or tingling occurred in 40% of sessions and did not limit participation. Four of five participants demonstrated clinically significant improvement on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity at 3-month follow up. Improvements were also observed in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and satisfaction scores. One participant with a prior craniectomy tolerated stimulation without adverse events. Conclusion: tDCS was well-tolerated in children and adolescents with chronic hemiparesis from childhood-onset stroke. These findings support the feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in this population and provide early-stage evidence to guide future randomized controlled trials exploring therapeutic applications of neuromodulation in childhood-onset stroke recovery. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05812794?term=AREA%5BBasicSearch%5D(pediatric%20stroke)&rank=10, ID: NCT05812794.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Human NeuroscienceSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207