MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412998417 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.04.668556

Cardiac metabolite exchange measured in pigs during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion

2025· preprint· en· W4412998417 on OpenAlexaff
Ian Tamburini, Aleksandra Stamenković, Hosung Bae, Wonsuk Choi, Marcus Seldin, Cholsoon Jang, Amir Ravandi

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaboliteCardiologyIschemiaInternal medicineMyocardial ischemiaMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury are the primary contributors to death in patients with cardiovascular disease. While decades of research have elucidated the molecular players and biochemical mechanisms underlying I/R injury, how these pathologies influence the metabolic activities of the heart remains incompletely understood. Such a knowledge gap hampers the development of therapies aimed at mitigating the metabolic stresses of the heart during injury. Using comprehensive arteriovenous metabolomics in a highly relevant porcine I/R model, we report the metabolic landscape of cardiac metabolic changes after ischemia and during the reperfusion time course. Paradoxically, ischemia increases the cardiac uptake of circulating fatty acids while reperfusion for 60 minutes reverses this activity. By 120 minutes of reperfusion, the hearts resume the uptake of fatty acids, suggesting restoration of their metabolism. On the other hand, we found a strong release of amino acids by the heart only after 60-minute reperfusion, but not after 120-minute reperfusion, implicating I/R-induced transient protein degradation. In addition to these findings, we identified several previously unrecognized changes in cardiac metabolic inputs and outputs during I/R, including nucleotides, TCA cycle intermediates and creatine/creatinine. These data highlight the dynamic alterations in cardiac metabolism in response to I/R, providing insights into how to mitigate myocardial I/R injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207