Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article examines interventions by Asian Canadian artists Derya Akay, Cindy Mochizuki, and Alize Zorlutana in the exhibitions Fugitive Rituals (2021) and Artwork Becomes Dinner Party (2023) at Agnes Etherington Art Centre, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. These exhibitions undermined the colonial underpinnings of the university museum and nourished community and collectivity but also revealed deep disparities in the institution. They underscored how democratic outcomes are rarely untroubled by buried museal histories. Structural change currently underway at the museum presents a critical opportunity to imagine new possibilities. Diasporic collections like the Migratory Collection, which point to the museum’s colonial legacies, require the care and knowledge of diasporic artists to make their place at the museum meaningful. There is also an urgent need for Queen’s University to recognize the colonial legacy of Agnes’s Migratory Collection and to fund appropriate museum experts, in permanent positions, to undertake the decolonial work necessary to facilitate lasting change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".