MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413004969 · doi:10.3390/biom15081133

Tauopathies: Calmodulin Regulates Tau Hyperphosphorylation and Its Transformation into Disease-Specific Aggregates

2025· review· en· W4413004969 on OpenAlexaff
Danton H. O’Day

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomolecules · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperphosphorylationTau pathologyTauopathyKinasePhosphorylationPhosphataseNeuroscienceTau proteinCalmodulinBiologyCell biologyDiseaseChemistryAlzheimer's diseaseNeurodegenerationMedicineBiochemistryInternal medicineEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tauopathies are a diverse group of neurodegenerative diseases characterized by the presence of Tau inclusions in neurons and glia. Rather than the classic steps in the transformation of Tau into neurofibrillary tangles, as first studied in Alzheimer's disease, studies on tauopathies reveal the presence of diverse Tau aggregates that appear to be disease-specific. Regardless, the phosphorylation and hyperphosphorylation of Tau, involving various kinases and phosphatases, appear to be central to all tauopathies. As in other neurodegenerative diseases, calcium dysregulation is an early event in multiple tauopathies, where it activates calmodulin to effect downstream events. Here, the events of Tau phosphorylation and hyperphosphorylation, which involve several CaM-dependent kinases and a single CaM-regulated phosphatase, are covered. In addition, CaM has been linked to other events, including Tau aggregation. As a central player in tauopathies, CaM offers several alternative therapeutic routes that are worth investigating. For example, evidence is presented here that supports targeting specific binding motifs of key CaM-regulated Tau kinases as a novel therapeutic approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomoleculesSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207