MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413005786 · doi:10.1039/d5em00391a

Drivers and riverine fluxes of rare earth elements to coastal ecosystems across temperate, boreal, and subarctic ecoregions in Eastern Canada

2025· article· en· W4413005786 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Marie-Christine Lafrenière, Md. Samrat Alam, Jean‐François Lapierre, Dominic E. Ponton, Maxime Wauthy, Caroline Fink‐Mercier, Holly Marginson, Paul A. del Giorgio, Marc Amyot

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science Processes & Impacts · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaUniversité de MontréalBureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesIndigenous and Northern Affairs CanadaCanada Research ChairsGroupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologieNiskamoon Corporation
KeywordsSubarctic climateEnvironmental scienceTemperate climateBorealWatershedClimate changeEcosystemBayHydrology (agriculture)OceanographyPhysical geographyEcologyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

), Canada. Furthermore, we observed their differences in REE composition as well as the main factors driving their concentrations. We estimated the annual export of total REEs flowing into the Hudson Bay (1078 t per year) and the Atlantic Ocean (2941 t per year), which could increase significantly with climate change effects on the northern ecosystems. From these watersheds, rivers draining the Canadian Shield geology, characterized by lower water temperature and pH, but higher concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and iron (Fe), exhibited higher concentrations of REEs compared to the broader study area, especially filtered light REEs (LREEs). In southern Quebec, rivers with intensive agricultural erosion were identified as REE export hotspots relative to their watershed area, while rivers draining densely populated regions exported anthropogenic gadolinium (Gd) (0.2-134 kg per year), contributing significantly to their total filtered Gd flux (18-98%). These findings provide essential baseline data to predict regional impacts of climate changes and anthropogenic activities on REE mobilization across evolving landscapes and clarify the role of temperate, boreal and subarctic rivers in the global REE cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science Processes & ImpactsSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207