Long-Term Enrollment in a Community Exercise Program Attenuates Age-Related Declines in Fitness in Older Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction The purpose of this study was to examine changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and muscle strength (MS) in participants of a community-based exercise program through a retrospective chart review. Methods In this observational study, participants ( n = 124, 69 females) completed exercise tests before enrollment and after a minimum of 1 yr of participation. One-sample t -tests were used to compare annualized rates of change in CRF and MS compared with published rates of change. Results After a mean follow-up time of 5.2 ± 2.6 yr, absolute and relative rates of decline in peak oxygen uptake (V˙O 2peak ) were less than expected among males, whereas absolute and relative V˙O 2peak improved over time in females compared with established rates of decline. Rates of decline in strength were less than the established rates of decline in both males and females. Conclusion These findings suggest that enrollment in a community-based exercise program was associated with improved aerobic and muscular fitness outcomes in both females and males compared with established rates of change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".