Bentall procedure with a continuous suture technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 47-year-old female with dyspnoea, poor blood pressure control and a family history of aortic disease presented with chronic type IA aortic dissection (with a maximal aortic diameter of 50 mm at the ascending aorta level). Anatomically, the patient presented with involvement of the brachiocephalic trunk and the left renal artery originated from the false lumen. The aortic valve was trileaflet but demonstrated severe eccentric insufficiency. Due to this constellation of findings, urgent surgical repair was indicated. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established centrally by direct true lumen cannulation with Seldinger echo-guided technique and cross-clamping between the distal ascending aorta and the proximal aortic arch (zone 0) performed while cooling. A period of high-moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (26°C core temperature) with bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion was utilized to complete the distal reconstruction. To repair the morphologically normal trileaflet but severely regurgitant aortic valve prolapsing in the dissected aortic root a valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure) was performed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".