An Integrated Bond Graph Methodology for Building Performance Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building performance simulation is crucial for the design and optimization of sustainable buildings. However, the increasing complexity of building systems necessitates advanced modeling techniques capable of handling multi-domain interactions. This paper presents a novel application of the bond graph (BG) methodology to simulate and analyze the thermal behavior of an integrated trigeneration system within an experimental test cell. Unlike conventional simulation approaches, the BG framework enables unified modeling of thermal and hydraulic subsystems, offering a physically consistent and energy-based representation of system dynamics. The study investigates the system’s performance under both dynamic and steady-state conditions across two distinct climatic periods. Validation against experimental data reveals strong agreement between measured and simulated temperatures in heating and cooling scenarios, with minimal deviations. This confirms the method’s reliability and its capacity to capture transient thermal behaviors. The results also demonstrate the BG model’s effectiveness in supporting predictive control strategies, optimizing energy efficiency, and maintaining thermal comfort. By integrating hydraulic circuits and thermal exchange processes within a single modeling framework, this work highlights the potential of bond graphs as a robust and scalable tool for advanced building performance simulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".