MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413007618 · doi:10.31579/2640-1053/244

Cancer Vaccines: A Brief Overview

2025· article· en· W4413007618 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rehan Haider

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of KarachiUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsCancerMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer vaccine strategies differ from traditional vaccines for infectious diseases by focusing on treating active disease rather than preventing infection. This review provides an overview of various cancer vaccines and adjuvants explored to reduce tumor burden. Some vaccines are approved or in late-stage clinical trials, including the dendritic cell vaccine Sipuleucel-T (Provenge) and the recombinant viral prostate cancer vaccine PSA-TRICOM (Prostvac-VF). Vaccines against oncogenic viruses like human papillomavirus (HPV) are beyond the scope of this review. Cancer-associated "altered self" antigens often induce weaker immune responses compared to foreign antigens from pathogens, necessitating the use of immune stimulants and adjuvants. Vaccine types explored include autologous immune cell vaccines, recombinant virus vaccines, peptide vaccines, DNA vaccines, and whole-cell vaccines derived from human tumor cell lines. Recent advances in understanding tumor-induced immunosuppression and immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as ipilimumab, offer new opportunities for improving cancer vaccine efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research and Cellular TherapeuticsSame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207