‘Marginality and Fragility in African Cinemas’
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For over a half century, filmmakers on the African continent and in the diaspora have contended with the legacies of colonial policies and their marginalizing effects on the people, spaces and cultures of the continent. Using film, they have repeatedly argued that fragilization and marginalization of Africans provided the mainstay of colonial conquest and domination. Whether the French civilizing mission or the British Indirect rule, the aim was to push local African populations to the sidelines of their own lives, territories and histories. Thus, as directors, militant artists and critics, filmmakers undertook to accelerate the process of invalidating various types of social exclusion, foster new agencies, suggest new identities and promote new societies. The papers in this collection address the film aesthetics and discursive strategies adopted by filmmakers from different parts of the continent to dissect and counter such marginalizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it