MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413008943 · doi:10.1386/jac_00129_1

Pidgin Englishes, marginality and fragility in Nollywood cinema: Exploring language, culture and storytelling

2025· article· en· W4413008943 on OpenAlex
Ben Akoh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of African Cinemas · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPidginStorytellingMovie theaterFragilityLinguisticsSociologyArtHistoryLiteratureNarrativeCreole languagePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nigerian Pidgin English serves as a means of communication and cultural expression in Nollywood films. Its usage is often stigmatized and marginalized, relegating Nigerian Pidgin English to inferior status compared to standard English. This article explores the sociocultural dynamics surrounding language ideologies and the tensions between monolingual and multilingual language enterprises. It analyses the cultural significance of storytelling in Nollywood, where language plays a crucial role in conveying community values and preserving knowledge systems. By examining the work of Nollywood director Ema Edosio, who focuses on authentic Nigerian narratives, the article underscores the power of Pidgin English as a tool for agency, cultural mediation and for challenging dominant linguistic paradigms. Perhaps it is not Nigerian Pidgin English that is fragile or marginalized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it