MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413009077 · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.117830

Stochastic optimization of thermal energy storage for multi-energy systems with hydrogen and renewable integration

2025· article· en· W4413009077 on OpenAlex
Lalji Kumar, Uttam Kumar Khedlekar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Storage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyHydrogen storageComputer scienceEnergy storageEnergy (signal processing)Hydrogen fuelEnvironmental scienceHydrogenEngineeringChemistryPhysicsThermodynamicsElectrical engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes a novel, unified techno-economic and optimization framework that integrates thermal energy storage (TES) into multi-energy systems, explicitly highlighting its critical role in balancing renewable intermittency and enhancing system flexibility. Addressing the increasing demand for scalable, cost-effective, and flexible storage technologies, this research uniquely combines sensible, latent, thermochemical, and hybrid TES methods with battery storage and hydrogen production, optimized via advanced stochastic modeling techniques. Employing real-world weather data and multi-day load scenarios, the developed stochastic optimization model demonstrates significant technical and economic benefits across detailed case studies in district heating (Spain), hydrogen production (Germany), and seasonal borehole thermal energy storage (Canada). Results clearly underscore the framework’s effectiveness, achieving remarkable emission reductions of up to 65% and cost savings exceeding 30% compared to conventional scenarios without TES integration. Key performance indicators, including levelized cost of storage, round-trip efficiency, carbon offset potential, and net present value, further emphasize TES’s superior performance and economic feasibility in renewable-rich environments. This research provides robust evidence supporting TES integration as essential for carbon-neutral, resilient, and economically dispatchable renewable energy infrastructures, offering a replicable modeling approach and valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and energy system planners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it