MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413009102 · doi:10.1159/000547799

Role of a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-Guided Strategy of Isavuconazole for Optimizing Efficacy/Safety Outcomes in Onco-Hematological Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4413009102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemotherapy · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyMEDLINERetrospective cohort studyIntensive care medicineRandomized controlled trialCohort studyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Evidence concerning the implementation of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided approach for optimizing isavuconazole exposure in onco-hematological pediatric patients is limited. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the current evidence about the role that a TDM-guided strategy of isavuconazole may have in optimizing efficacy/safety outcomes of invasive fungal infection (IFI) treatment/prophylaxis among onco-hematological pediatric patients. METHODS: Two authors independently searched the PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus databases up to 25 April 2025, to retrieve randomized controlled trials or observational studies providing real-life data assessing isavuconazole exposure according to a TDM-guided approach in pediatric patients, and evaluating the relationship between isavuconazole exposure and efficacy/safety outcomes. Data were independently extracted by the two authors, and the quality of the included studies was independently assessed by means of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0) in case of randomized controlled trials, and by means of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale in case of observational studies and case series. Mortality attributable to IFI and hepatotoxicity occurrence were selected as primary outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used for summarizing the retrieved data. RESULTS: After screening 577 articles, eight studies were included in the systematic review (five retrospective observational cohort studies and 3 case series; n = 116). Attainment of optimal isavuconazole exposure at first TDM assessment ranged from 36.7% to 83.3% of included patients, being underexposure reported in up to 40.0% of cases. Overall, mortality attributable to IFI occurred in 10 out of 59 patients (16.9%) in which this outcome was evaluated, being associated with isavuconazole underexposure only in 30.0% of cases. Hepatotoxicity occurred in 14 out of 78 included patients (17.9%), being related to isavuconazole overexposure in 50.0% of cases. CONCLUSION: Despite limited findings, our systematic review may support a potential role for a TDM-guided strategy in optimizing isavuconazole exposure among onco-hematological pediatric patients, particularly considering both the non-negligible proportion of cases who failed in attaining optimal exposure with standard dosing regimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it