Collaborative Learning of Augmentation and Disentanglement for Semi-Supervised Domain Generalized Medical Image Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores a challenging yet realistic scenario: semi-supervised domain generalization (SSDG) that includes label scarcity and domain shift problems. We pinpoint that the limitations of previous SSDG methods lie in 1) neglecting the difference between domain shifts existing within a training dataset (intra-domain shift, IDS) and those occurring between training and testing datasets (cross-domain shift, CDS) and 2) overlooking the interplay between label scarcity and domain shifts, resulting in these methods merely stitching together semi-supervised learning (SSL) and domain generalization (DG) techniques. Considering these limitations, we propose a novel perspective to decompose SSDG into the combination of unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) and DG problems. To this end, we design a causal augmentation and disentanglement framework (CausalAD) for semi-supervised domain generalized medical image segmentation. Concretely, CausalAD involves two collaborative processes: an augmentation process, which utilizes disentangled style factors to perform style augmentation for UDA, and a disentanglement process, which decouples domain-invariant (content) and domain-variant (noise and style) features for DG. Furthermore, we propose a proxy-based self-paced training strategy (ProSPT) to guide the training of CausalAD by gradually selecting unlabeled image pixels with high-quality pseudo labels in a self-paced training manner. Finally, we introduce a hierarchical structural causal model (HSCM) to explain the intuition and concept behind our method. Extensive experiments in the cross-sequence, cross-site, and cross-modality semi-supervised domain generalized medical image segmentation settings show the effectiveness of CausalAD and its superiority over the state-of-the-art. The code is available at https://github.com/Senyh/CausalAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".