Le temps de la Lune : de la représentation des violences genrées à la résurgence des savoirs menstruels dans les littératures autochtones contemporaines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article met à contribution les écritures littéraires autochtones et la manière dont celles-ci peuvent devenir des lieux de savoirs situés et relationnels qui engagent un processus de revitalisation des connaissances féminines en lien avec Tipiskâwi-pîsim, la Lune en nehiyawewin. Ce faisant, il aborde le lien entre Tipiskâwi-pîsim et les jeunes filles autochtones à partir de l’expérience des premières menstruations et de sa représentation en littérature en formulant la question suivante : comment la littérature permet-elle une reprise en charge narrative et symbolique des savoirs féminins autochtones associés aux menstruations et quel rôle joue Tipiskâwi-pîsim dans la constitution et la revitalisation de ces savoirs à la fois culturels et corporels ? Afin de répondre à cette question, l’autrice analyse le recueil Burning in this Midnight Dream de la poète nehiyaw Louise Bernice Halfe et l’album jeunesse Moon Time Prayer de l’autrice métisse de la Rivière Rouge Cindy Gaudet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".