MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413017280 · doi:10.22215/etd/2025-16653

Beyond Boundaries: Rethinking The Mosque A Design for Montreal’s North African Community of Le Petit Maghreb

2025· dissertation· en· W4413017280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Djebri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyHistoryAncient historyArtSociologyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is focused on the design of a mosque in Montreal engaging with questions of boundaries, thresholds and limits. In doing so, it explores how various constraints —ranging from zoning laws, politics, and orientation to cultural norms and gender segregation— affect its design and functionality. With my interest being on the city of Montreal and it’s so-called multicultural landscape, I seek to develop a comprehensive understanding of the mosque’s role in both reflecting and interacting with the North African Maghrebi community of “Le Petit Maghreb” in the Villeray—Saint-Michel—Parc-Extension borough. Through a combination of spatial mapping and collages, analysis of regulatory frameworks, and a proposed speculative design, I intend to provide a response to how mosques can be designed to overcome challenges related to visibility, safety, and inclusivity, fostering a sense of belonging, welcoming and identity within Montreal’s urban fabric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicArchitecture and Cultural InfluencesFrench-language works237,207