MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413017699 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3596467

FEDORA: Federated Ensemble Reinforcement Learning for DAG-Based Task Offloading and Resource Allocation in MEC

2025· article· en· W4413017699 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sangrez Khan, Amir Ali-Pour, Marios Avgeris, Julien Gascon‐Samson, Aris Leivadeas

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningTask (project management)Resource allocationResource management (computing)Artificial intelligenceDistributed computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing demand for compute intensive Internet of Thing (IoT) applications has accelerated the adoption of multi-access edge Computing (MEC) to offload tasks from resource constrained devices to edge servers. However, making optimal offloading decisions in multi-user MEC environments is challenging due to the dependencies between tasks, resource constraints, and the need to preserve user privacy. In this work, we propose FEDORA, a federated ensemble reinforcement learning framework for directed acyclic graph (DAG)-based task Offloading and resource allocation in MEC environments, that integrates twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient (TD3) for continuous resource allocation and multi-head deep Q-networks (DQN) for discrete offloading decisions. To handle task dependencies, we model applications as DAGs and generate feature embeddings for offloading decisions. Our federated learning (FL) approach uses local training at MEC level and periodic model aggregation at a global server to preserve data privacy. Finally, extensive simulations across different DAG topologies demonstrate that FEDORA reduces system costs and improves task completion rates compared to state-of-the-art baselines including FL-DQN, FL-DDPG, FedAvg, FedNova, and SCAFFOLD, highlighting its scalability and robustness in large scale MEC deployments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207