MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413019803 · doi:10.1139/facets-2024-0229

X-ray modalities in the era of artificial intelligence: overview of self-supervised learning approach

2025· article· en· W4413019803 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ivan Martinović, Shitong Mao, Mehdy Dousty, W. Li, Milena Đukanović, Errol Colak, Ervin Sejdić

Bibliographic record

VenueFACETS · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModalitiesArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMachine learningSociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-supervised learning enables the creation of algorithms that outperform supervised pre-training methods in numerous computer vision tasks. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of self-supervised learning applications across various X-ray modalities, including conventional X-ray, computed tomography, mammography, and dental X-ray. Apart from the application of self-supervised learning in the interpretation phase of X-ray images, the paper also emphasizes the critical role of self-supervised learning integration in the preprocessing and archiving phase. Furthermore, the paper explores the application of self-supervised learning in multi-modal scenarios, which represents a key future direction in developing machine learning-based applications across the field of medicine. Lastly, the paper addresses the main challenges associated with the development of self-supervised learning applications tailored for X-ray modalities. The findings from the reviewed literature strongly suggest that the self-supervised learning approach has the potential to be a “ game-changer”, enabling the elimination of the current situation where many machine learning-based systems are developed but few are deployed in daily clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFACETSSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207