MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413025037 · doi:10.1177/13872877251364558

Navigating life after diagnosis: Insights from people with early-stage dementia

2025· article· en· W4413025037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Alzheimer s Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Canadian institutionsQuest University CanadaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioemotional selectivity theoryDementiaPsychologyCoping (psychology)Psychological resilienceAgency (philosophy)Identity (music)FlourishingCognitionAdaptation (eye)Developmental psychologyDiseaseCognitive psychologyPsychotherapistMedicineSociologyPsychiatryAestheticsNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Receiving an Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis is widely understood as a life-changing event, that is, one that challenges not only memory and cognition but one's sense of identity and agency. By centering the voices of those affected and aligning findings with socioemotional selectivity and continuity theories, the study by Gamm et al. offers valuable insights into individualized care strategies and the importance of emotional resilience and identity preservation in early-stage AD. This commentary situates the study within the broader landscape of dementia care, highlighting its clinical implications for supporting agency, emotional well-being, and identity preservation. It also aims to critically reflect on how coping responses are interpreted in the original study and to advocate for a more nuanced understanding of emotional adaptation in early-stage dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it