Characterization of bacterial fucokinase/GDP-fucose pyrophosphorylase (FKP) enzymes supports the evolution of interdomain communication and modularity in the FKP family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT L-fucokinase (FUK) and GDP-fucose pyrophosphorylase (GFPP) salvage free L-fucose and synthesize the valuable nucleotide-sugar GDP-L-fucose (GDP-Fuc). Some organisms express these enzymes as one bifunctional polypeptide called L-fucokinase/GDP-fucose pyrophosphorylase (FKP), which has attracted attention for use in the chemoenzymatic synthesis of GDP-Fuc. Despite the documented use of the FKP from Bacteroides fragilis ( Bf FKP ) , the evolutionary origins of these enzymes and their relationships to monofunctional FUKs and GFPPs are poorly understood. We hypothesized that biochemical characterization of these proteins coupled with an evolutionary analysis would uncover the natural diversity of FKPs, facilitating the discovery of new biocatalysts. Phylogenetic and sequence similarity network (SSN) analyses distinguished FKPs from FUKs and GFPPs, suggesting that FKPs originate from one ancestral fusion event between these domains. To evaluate how environmental factors might select for functional diversity within the FKP family, we recombinantly expressed and purified a putative FKP from the thermophilic bacterium Thermophagus xiamenensis ( Tx FKP). This enzyme exhibited in vitro kinase and pyrophosphorylase activities and demonstrated subtle kinetic differences compared to Bf FKP. While alanine scanning mutational analysis of the Tx FKP FUK and GFPP domains supported the role of conserved residues that Tx FKP uses to coordinate substrate binding and catalysis, other mutations in the Tx FKP GFPP domain influenced kinase activity differentially for the substrates L-fucose and D-arabinose, showing an unprecedented role for the GFPP domain in FUK substrate specificity. Finally, thermal shift profiles of Tx FKP and Bf FKP were biphasic and provided new insights into how these enzymes have evolved to respond to different sugar substrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".