On the formal Peterson subalgebra and its dual
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the present notes, we study a generalization of the Peterson subalgebra to an oriented (generalized) cohomology theory which we call the formal Peterson subalgebra. Observe that by recent results of Zhong the dual of the formal Peterson algebra provides an algebraic model for the oriented cohomology of the affine Grassmannian. Our first result shows that the centre of the formal affine Demazure algebra (FADA) generates the formal Peterson subalgebra. Our second observation is motivated by the Peterson conjecture. We show that a certain localization of the formal Peterson subalgebra for the extended Dynkin diagram of type $\hat A_1$ provides an algebraic model for “quantum” oriented cohomology of the projective line. Our last result can be viewed as an extension of the previous results on Hopf algebroids of structure algebras of moment graphs to the case of affine root systems. We prove that the dual of the formal Peterson subalgebra (an oriented cohomology of the affine Grassmannian) is the zeroth Hochschild homology of the FADA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".