What is the long-term efficacy and safety of selective laser trabeculoplasty in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a laser-based intervention used to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). It has been adopted as both a primary and adjunctive therapy, with growing interest in its long-term outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of SLT in adult patients with POAG, with a focus on sustained IOP control, reduction in medication burden, preservation of visual function, and adverse event incidence. METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251030192). A systematic literature search was performed on June 16, 2025, across PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Scopus, including all records from database inception to the search date. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting SLT outcomes with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months were included. Primary outcomes included long-term IOP reduction and SLT failure rates. Secondary outcomes included medication use, visual field changes, and adverse events. Study quality was assessed using ROB-2 and Newcastle-Ottawa tools. Data were synthesized using random-effects models, and inter-study heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic. RESULTS: From 3462 identified records, 60 clinical studies were included for qualitative synthesis and 50 were included in the meta-analysis, representing a pooled sample of 8934 eyes. SLT achieved IOP reduction comparable to topical medications at 6-12 months post-treatment (mean difference: 0.04 mmHg; 95 % CI:0.27 to 0.34). Medication use significantly decreased following SLT (mean reduction:0.87 medications; 95 % CI:1.13 to -0.62). Visual field mean deviation improved by 0.79 dB (95 % CI: 0.76 to 0.82), and SLT was associated with minimal short-term IOP spikes. The health-related quality-of-life scores, as measured by EQ-5D, showed modest but consistent improvements. Risk of bias and publication bias were low in most domains. CONCLUSION: SLT demonstrated sustained long-term efficacy in reducing intraocular pressure and minimizing pharmacological burden in patients with POAG. It maintained visual function over extended follow-up and was associated with a favorable safety profile, including a low incidence of adverse events and IOP spikes. These findings support the use of SLT as an effective and safe long-term management option for POAG and justify its consideration as a first-line or adjunctive therapy in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.051 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.026 | 0.048 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".