Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ancient Chinese theatre system was described in Xian Qing Ou Ji by Li Yu (1611-1680), and can be translated as ‘Speaking honestly, if an actor wants to perform a role, it means that the actor speaks instead of the inside thought, so the actor must put their heart into the role to be real during the performance. Actors need to be in the scene personally and there should be true feeling in it.’ The actor should convey their emotions to the audience and must put their whole heart into the character’s background to show their imagination on the stage; this is also an important theory by Stanislavski. From ancient to contemporary theatre theory, and from Chinese theatre to the European theatre, both imagination and physical techniques are crucial to performance. Kunqu opera’s performance convention and formula also may improve actors’ performance techniques. This research integrated Chinese theatre and Europe theatre practice for further expansion and development. Actors’ skills relate to their imagination and physical movement. This research has enriched existing universal performance training methods, and the significance proves the Kunqu opera training be beneficial to contemporary actor’s physical.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".