MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413043816 · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2025.110737

Assessment of AlSi-based abradable coatings with hBN and MoCr additives for aerospace conditions: A novel high-temperature rig approach

2025· article· en· W4413043816 on OpenAlexafffund
Kaue Bertuol, Bruno Edu Arendarchuck, Francisco Rivadeneira, L.-P. Nolte, M. Lehner, Barry Barnett, Christian Moreau, Pantcho Stoyanov

Bibliographic record

VenueAerospace Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced ceramic materials synthesis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersConcordia UniversityConsortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au QuébecPratt and Whitney Canada
KeywordsAerospaceMaterials scienceAerospace engineeringMetallurgyMechanical engineeringComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Abradable coatings are crucial for enhancing gas turbine efficiency and enabling sustainable aviation by reducing fuel consumption and protecting rotor components during blade-casing interactions. However, assessing their performance under relevant speed and temperature conditions remains challenging due to the cost and complexity of custom-built abradable rigs. This study addresses these challenges by upgrading an existing abradable test rig with a high-temperature module, supporting scalable materials testing under extreme gas turbine and hydrogen-compatible turbine conditions. It also evaluates the abradability performance of three thermally sprayed AlSi-based coatings at 300°C. (1) AlSi-Poly, with 40 wt% polyester as a baseline; (2) AlSi-MoCr, with similar polyester content plus small additions of molybdenum (Mo) and chromium (Cr); and (3) AlSi-hBN-Poly, with 6 wt% hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) and 20 wt% polyester. The inclusion of hBN, an eco-friendly solid lubricant, and MoCr, recognized for corrosion resistance, reflects growing interest in materials designed for energy-efficient turbines and Industry 4.0 aerospace systems. Abradability tests showed that AlSi-Poly and AlSi-MoCr outperformed AlSi-hBN-Poly at both temperatures based on lower reaction forces. All coatings exhibited reduced forces at 300°C due to thermal softening. AlSi-Poly and AlSi-MoCr demonstrated comparable abradability, with smoother wear tracks at room temperature that worsened at 300°C, along with increased dynamic interaction coefficient (Ft/Fn). In contrast, AlSi-hBN-Poly stood out for its thermal stability, higher roughness, and the lowest Ft/Fn. These findings also highlight the relevance of the high-temperature abradable rig as a cost-effective platform for pre-screening aerospace abradables under application-relevant conditions, bridging fundamental research and engine testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAerospace Science and TechnologySame topicAdvanced ceramic materials synthesisFrench-language works237,207