Intergenerational Changes During the Pandemic: Presentation of the Contexts to Go Forward
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this conclusion, I underline the transversal conceptualizations of intergenerational relationships in context of the COVID-19 pandemic represented in this special issue using these four metatheoretical orientations: Ontology: status and definitions of the themes of intergenerationality and pandemic as well as their interrelated dimensions.Formism: spatially conceiving these themes in reference to structural dimensions (vs agency) in a holistic perspective.Temporality: temporally situating them.Indeterminacy: conceiving these themes in the light of uncertainty and unpredictability.I demonstrate that the authors’ analysis is primarily structural and ecological, presenting a dynamic representation of generational ecology. Going beyond the authors, I display that the transient nature of intergenerationality in a changing society implies a mobile conception of generation and intergenerationality in a poststructuralist trend that the pandemic enables me to revisit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it