MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413049066 · doi:10.1016/j.hrcr.2025.08.002

Atypical atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia misdiagnosed as ventricular tachycardia: Implantable defibrillator overuse in an athlete

2025· article· en· W4413049066 on OpenAlexaff
Karan Saraf, Sergey Barsamyan, Cheng Ken Ong, Chris Skene

Bibliographic record

VenueHeartRhythm Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineTachycardiaVentricular tachycardiaImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorElectrophysiology studyCatheter ablationAblation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 25-year-old male presented to his local district general hospital with palpitations, light-headedness, and syncope, often while playing soccer. He had no past medical or surgical history, was not taking any regular medications, and reported no illicit drug use. There was no family history of cardiomyopathy or sudden death. He was an amateur athlete, playing soccer for approximately 12 hours per week and performing aerobic exercise in the gym. The baseline 12-lead ECG was normal (figure 1A). An implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) was inserted, and within one month, multiple episodes of monomorphic wide complex tachycardia (WCT) >250bpm were detected, associated with presyncope (figure 1B).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeartRhythm Case ReportsSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207