MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413049945 · doi:10.1002/mus.28477

<scp>AAOS</scp> 2024 <scp>CTS</scp> Guidelines—Comments by Members of <scp>AANEM CTS</scp> Severity Scale Workgroup

2025· article· en· W4413049945 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy D.P. Bland, Devon I. Rubin, Lawrence R. Robinson, Michael Cartwright, Michael Andary, John C. Kincaid, Zainab Al‐lawati, Peter Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscle & Nerve · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkgroupScale (ratio)Computer sciencePhysicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr John Kincaid reports receiving royalties for authorship in the Rehabilitation Medicine Quick Reference series by Demos Medical Publishers. Carpal tunnel diagnosis, including EMG, is covered in the book. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors have nothing to report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.083

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuscle & NerveSame topicPeripheral Nerve DisordersFrench-language works237,207