MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413051899 · doi:10.1121/10.0037204

Perception of PIN-PEN merger in Southern and non-Southern speakers of American English

2025· article· en· W4413051899 on OpenAlexafffund
Irene Smith, Meghan Clayards

Bibliographic record

VenueJASA Express Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre for Research on Brain Language and Music
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture
KeywordsNasalityCodaPerceptionVowelPsychologyAudiologyTask (project management)LinguisticsSpeech recognitionAcousticsComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Merged productions of /ɪ/ and /ɛ/ before nasal consonants is well documented in Southern U.S. English, but perception studies on this merger are limited. A two-alternative forced-choice perception task asked U.S. listeners from inside and outside the South to respond to stimuli on continua from bid to bed and bin to Ben. Vowel nasality and coda nasality were fully crossed in the stimuli. The results confirm that Southern speakers are to some degree merged in perception, and that the presence of a nasal coda, and not vowel nasality, conditions merger in perception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJASA Express LettersSame topicPhonetics and Phonology ResearchFrench-language works237,207