MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413054653 · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003366

Pilot study evaluating frailty-focused care for hospitalised patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2025· article· en· W4413054653 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sunita Mulpuru, Melanie Chin, Delvina Hasimja‐Saraqini, Jacqueline S. Sandoz, Nha Voduc, Smita Pakhalé, Jiro Inoue, J. Cassidy, J.I.M. LAWSON, Julia F Shaw, Wendy Laframboise, Tim Benson, Alan J. Forster

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open Quality · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMedicineCOPDPsychological interventionProspective cohort studyAcute careHealth careEmergency medicineCohortCohort studyPhysical therapyDisease managementConfidence intervalPulmonary diseaseDiseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with morbidity and mortality among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet there are no established care pathways to manage frail patients with COPD. To address this gap, we developed, implemented and assessed the feasibility of a new frailty-focused care model for patients hospitalised with exacerbations of COPD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study among hospitalised patients with acute exacerbations of COPD in an academic hospital in Canada over 18 months. We developed and implemented a frailty-focused care model using the degree of frailty to guide personalised assessments, education, and care interventions during and after hospital discharge. We assessed the feasibility of using frailty-focused care in a real-world setting with prespecified targets for recruitment rate, care model completion and collection of patient-reported outcomes including symptom burden, health confidence, health status and self-management scores. Patients were followed up at 3 months after hospitalisation to reassess patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: 87 patients used the frailty-focused care model during hospitalisation, 58 consented to participate in this study and 45 (78%) completed 3-month postdischarge follow-up. 47% (n=21) were at least mildly frail at baseline, with 35% (n=20) at risk of frailty. Target recruitment of 50 patients was achieved, and all participants completed core elements of frailty-focused care, including frailty assessment, personalised education and discharge planning. Patient-reported outcomes were measured in all participants in hospital, and in 78% (n=45) patients at 3-month follow-up. 23% (n=13) of patients initially reported feeling confident to manage their health condition. This improved to 62% (n=28) at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a foundation to build innovative care models for frail individuals with COPD and shows it is feasible to use frailty-focused care in a real-world hospital setting. Future work requires strong patient engagement to better align frailty-focused care with patient-centred goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open QualitySame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207