Comprehensive characterization and extraction implications of ion adsorption rare earth deposit from a South American source
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ion-adsorption rare earth element (REE) deposits are a critical resource for strategic materials, yet their characterization and processing remain complex. This study provides a comprehensive mineralogical, chemical, and geochemical analysis of an ionic clay sample from a South American source, integrating multiple characterization techniques, including XRD, SEM-EDX, XPS, ToF-SIMS, TIMA-X, EPMA, and LA-ICP-MS. The results confirm that kaolinite and micas dominate the matrix, with monazite identified as the primary REE-bearing mineral. Yttrium and heavy REEs are primarily hosted in clays, indicating the necessity of ion-exchange leaching for effective extraction. Liberation studies reveal that monazite is best liberated in finer fractions, suggesting a need for targeted pre-concentration strategies. Surface chemistry analyses demonstrate the presence of REEs as adsorbed species and inner-sphere complexes, supporting the use of selective leaching techniques. The study highlights the economic and environmental considerations of REE extraction from ionic clays and provides insights into optimizing recovery processes while mitigating environmental risks. These findings contribute to the growing body of research aimed at diversifying REE supply sources and improving sustainable extraction methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".