MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413054857 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-14891-3

Comprehensive characterization and extraction implications of ion adsorption rare earth deposit from a South American source

2025· article· en· W4413054857 on OpenAlexafffund
Spencer Cunningham, Tassos Grammatikopoulos, Baian Almusned, Jeffrey D. Henderson, Gisele Azimi

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLakes Environmental (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMonaziteLeaching (pedology)YttriumKaoliniteExtraction (chemistry)AdsorptionRare-earth elementEnvironmental chemistryCharacterization (materials science)Electron microprobeChemistryGeochemistryRare earthGeologyMineralogyMaterials scienceMetallurgySoil waterZirconNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ion-adsorption rare earth element (REE) deposits are a critical resource for strategic materials, yet their characterization and processing remain complex. This study provides a comprehensive mineralogical, chemical, and geochemical analysis of an ionic clay sample from a South American source, integrating multiple characterization techniques, including XRD, SEM-EDX, XPS, ToF-SIMS, TIMA-X, EPMA, and LA-ICP-MS. The results confirm that kaolinite and micas dominate the matrix, with monazite identified as the primary REE-bearing mineral. Yttrium and heavy REEs are primarily hosted in clays, indicating the necessity of ion-exchange leaching for effective extraction. Liberation studies reveal that monazite is best liberated in finer fractions, suggesting a need for targeted pre-concentration strategies. Surface chemistry analyses demonstrate the presence of REEs as adsorbed species and inner-sphere complexes, supporting the use of selective leaching techniques. The study highlights the economic and environmental considerations of REE extraction from ionic clays and provides insights into optimizing recovery processes while mitigating environmental risks. These findings contribute to the growing body of research aimed at diversifying REE supply sources and improving sustainable extraction methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207