Impact of specific productivity and operation mode upon the biophysical properties of HIV-1 Gag-based virus-like particles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are non-infective vaccine candidates that have gained interest given their natural ability to elicit strong immune responses. Particularly, HIV-1 Gag-based VLPs are one of the most described platforms for vaccine development, provided their ability for successful pseudotyping either by genetic engineering or click chemistry. When Gag polyprotein is recombinantly expressed, VLPs are naturally assembled in the vicinity of the cell membrane and then secreted by cell budding, taking part of the host cell membrane. Their properties are dependent upon the cell line and manufacturing method. Although great advancements toward the implementation of analytical methods have been made, VLP quality attributes are quite unclear whenever production is enhanced by metabolic engineering or process intensification strategies. This work offers a comparative study of VLP quality attributes upon transient gene expression (TGE) in HEK293 cell cultures operated in batch and perfusion mode. Moreover, the impact of specific productivity is also studied by ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene silencing, which has been reported to enhance fourfold VLP production. A linear negative correlation was found between the ratio of Gag monomers/VLP and specific productivity. 3100 ± 100 monomers/VLP were obtained for the standard batch production, dropping to 1900 ± 100 and 800 ± 60 for the perfusion and batch ATM-knockdown conditions, respectively. Furthermore, functionalization rates were measured in terms of Cy5 per total particles (TP). Both perfusion-derived nanoparticles achieved functionalization rates of 2800 Cy5/TP. On the contrary, those nanoparticles produced in batch yielded functionalization rates below 1000 Cy5/TP. Moreover, a complete lipidome analysis revealed a relative decrease in the quantity of lipid/particle for all studied conditions in comparison to the standard batch production. Finally, all VLP samples were characterized to assess the impact of the differential physicochemical properties upon purification and stability rates. KEY POINTS: • VLP quality inversely correlates with Gag-specific productivity and operation mode. • Functionalization and lipid content drop with metabolic burden or ATM silencing. • Perfusion enables high VLP recovery and lyophilization with preserved morphology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".