MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413066140 · doi:10.5376/bm.2025.16.0013

Mitochondrial Genome Evolution of Abalone and Its Applications in Species Identification

2025· article· en· W4413066140 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscience Methods · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbaloneIdentification (biology)Evolutionary biologyBiologyGenomeComputational biologyMitochondrial DNAZoologyEcologyFisheryGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Haliotis  includes a variety of marine shellfish with important economic and ecological values. In recent years, the mitochondrial genome has received extensive attention in the study of abalone systematic classification and species identification due to its unique advantages. This study systematically sorted out the structural characteristics of the abalone mitochondrial genome, the genetic variation pattern and the evolutionary relationship between different species, focusing on the analysis of the role of SNP and non-synonymous mutations in adaptive evolution. Through the construction of a whole-genome phylogenetic tree, the lineage differentiation and geographical isolation correlation within the genus Haliotis  were revealed, and the application potential of mitochondrial DNA markers (such as COI gene) in rapid species identification and traceability detection was evaluated. Combined with case analysis, the mitochondrial variation characteristics of abalone species in the southeast coast of China were compared, the genetic differences between introduced populations and local populations were evaluated, and the disputes over the classification of abalone in Japan, Australia and East Asia were discussed. The study shows that the evolutionary characteristics of the abalone mitochondrial genome are of great value for species identification, but different methods have their own advantages and limitations. This study aims to provide a basis for the systematic classification of the abalone genus, and to provide theoretical support for the scientific management of my country's abalone germplasm resources, the protection of genetic diversity and sustainable utilization, so as to improve the quality of abalone seed industry and ensure the ecological security of marine fisheries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it