Relation of cognitive functions and activities of daily living in older adults with diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Aging is a continuous, multifaceted, and irreversible process that leads to a gradual decline in physical, cognitive, and social abilities, alongside an increased risk of disease.Type 2 diabetes can induce metabolic changes that may impact cognitive functions and activities of daily living (ADL) in older adults.Objective: To examine the relationship between cognitive functions and ADL in older adults with type 2 diabetes at a health center in Oaxaca.Method: This quantitative, correlational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study used a finite population formula to determine the sample size, resulting in 277 older adults.Two assessment tools were employed: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test and the Barthel Index.Results: The study population was predominantly female (n = 181), with a mean age of 67.17 years (SD = 6.2).A probable cognitive disorder was reported in 53.2% (n = 147) of participants, while 83% (n = 230) remained independent in ADL.A statistically significant positive correlation (r = 0.396, p = 0.000) was found between cognitive function and ADL.Conclusions: The findings underscore the association between cognitive function and ADL in older adults with type 2 diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".