MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413074279 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3589527

Extreme Learning Machine-Based Feature Refinment for Channel Estimation in RIS-ISAC Systems

2025· article· en· W4413074279 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Feature (linguistics)Computer scienceEstimationArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectronic engineeringSystems engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems have emerged as a key enabler for future wireless networks, aiming to optimize spectral resource utilization for both sensing and communication tasks. The incorporation of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) with ISAC enables more efficient utilization of resources, improving the quality of communication and the accuracy of sensing. A critical aspect of deploying such systems reliably is accurate channel estimation. Traditional deep learning methods, though effective, often struggle with the intricate characteristics of communication channel matricies. This work introduces an innovative two-stage channel estimation approach for RIS-ISAC systems. The first stage focuses on feature refinement using an extreme learning machine framework to process the received signals and extract essential channel features. The second stage employs these refined features to estimate the desired channels through dedicated neural networks specifically designed for sensing and communication tasks. The numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed two-stage approach significantly outperforms the existing techniques across various system configurations. Moreover, the proposed method achieves a remarkable computational complexity reduction as compared to the state-of-the-art works. The results prove the robustness and efficiency of the proposed approach, facilitating more robust RIS-assisted ISAC deployments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it