MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413074279 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3589527

Extreme Learning Machine-Based Feature Refinment for Channel Estimation in RIS-ISAC Systems

2025· article· en· W4413074279 on OpenAlexafffund
Alice Faisal, Ibrahim Al-Nahhal, Octavia A. Dobre, Hyundong Shin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Feature (linguistics)Computer scienceEstimationArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectronic engineeringSystems engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems have emerged as a key enabler for future wireless networks, aiming to optimize spectral resource utilization for both sensing and communication tasks. The incorporation of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) with ISAC enables more efficient utilization of resources, improving the quality of communication and the accuracy of sensing. A critical aspect of deploying such systems reliably is accurate channel estimation. Traditional deep learning methods, though effective, often struggle with the intricate characteristics of communication channel matricies. This work introduces an innovative two-stage channel estimation approach for RIS-ISAC systems. The first stage focuses on feature refinement using an extreme learning machine framework to process the received signals and extract essential channel features. The second stage employs these refined features to estimate the desired channels through dedicated neural networks specifically designed for sensing and communication tasks. The numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed two-stage approach significantly outperforms the existing techniques across various system configurations. Moreover, the proposed method achieves a remarkable computational complexity reduction as compared to the state-of-the-art works. The results prove the robustness and efficiency of the proposed approach, facilitating more robust RIS-assisted ISAC deployments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207