Potential Benefits of Polar Transformation of Time–Frequency Electrocardiogram (ECG) Signals for Evaluation of Cardiac Arrhythmia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a lack of studies on the effectiveness of polar-transformed spectrograms in the visualization and prediction of cardiac arrhythmias from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. In this study, single-lead ECG waveforms were converted into two-dimensional rectangular time–frequency spectrograms and polar time–frequency spectrograms. Three pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models (ResNet50, MobileNet, and DenseNet121) served as baseline networks for model development and testing. Prediction performance and visualization quality were evaluated across various image resolutions. The trade-offs between image resolution and model capacity were quantitatively analyzed. Polar-transformed spectrograms demonstrated superior delineation of R-R intervals at lower image resolutions (e.g., 96 × 96 pixels) compared to conventional spectrograms. For deep-learning-based classification of cardiac arrhythmias, polar-transformed spectrograms achieved comparable accuracy to conventional spectrograms across all evaluated resolutions. The results suggest that polar-transformed spectrograms are particularly advantageous for deep CNN predictions at lower resolutions, making them suitable for edge computing applications where the reduced use of computing resources, such as memory and power consumption, is desirable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".