A DeepAR-Based Modeling Framework for Probabilistic Mid-Long Term Streamflow Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mid–long term streamflow prediction (MLSP) plays a critical role in water resource planning amid growing hydroclimatic and anthropogenic uncertainties. Although AI-based models have demonstrated strong performance in MLSP, their capacity to quantify predictive uncertainty remains limited. To address this challenge, a DeepAR-based probabilistic modeling framework is developed, enabling direct estimation of streamflow distribution parameters and flexible selection of output distributions. The framework is applied to two case studies with distinct hydrological characteristics, where combinations of recurrent model structures (GRU and LSTM) and output distributions (Normal, Student’s t, and Gamma) are systematically evaluated. Results indicate that models employing the Gamma distribution consistently outperform those using Normal and Student’s t distributions. In the Upper Wudongde Reservoir area, the model using LSTM structure and Gamma distribution reduces RMSE from 1407.77 m³/s to 1016.54 m³/s. As the forecast horizon extends, the Gamma-based models demonstrate more reliable probabilistic predictions, reflected by sharper and better-calibrated prediction intervals. This is evidenced by substantially reduced CRPS values at the 18th forecast horizon (521.4 and 1746.6 m³/s), compared to Normal-based models (747.6 and 1877.5 m³/s). Although the improvements in predictive performance achieved by the proposed modeling framework vary depending on the RNN model architecture used and the specific application region, it generally delivers consistent enhancement in forecasting accuracy, thereby providing stronger support for practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".