DeepISLES: a clinically validated ischemic stroke segmentation model from the ISLES'22 challenge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted MRI is critical for diagnosing and managing ischemic stroke, but variability in images and disease presentation limits the generalizability of AI algorithms. We present DeepISLES, a robust ensemble algorithm developed from top submissions to the 2022 Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation challenge we organized. By combining the strengths of best-performing methods from leading research groups, DeepISLES achieves superior accuracy in detecting and segmenting ischemic lesions, generalizing well across diverse axes. Validation on a large external dataset (N = 1685) confirms its robustness, outperforming previous state-of-the-art models by 7.4% in Dice score and 12.6% in F1 score. It also excels at extracting clinical biomarkers and correlates strongly with clinical stroke scores, closely matching expert performance. Neuroradiologists prefer DeepISLES' segmentations over manual annotations in a Turing-like test. Our work demonstrates DeepISLES' clinical relevance and highlights the value of biomedical challenges in developing real-world, generalizable AI tools. DeepISLES is freely available at https://github.com/ezequieldlrosa/DeepIsles .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".