MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413093950 · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126864

Selective separation of lithium using concentration polarization near ion exchange membranes: A proof-of-concept study

2025· article· en· W4413093950 on OpenAlexafffund
Sandali Panagoda, Younggy Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConcentration polarizationElectrodialysisChemistryMembraneIon exchangeWastewaterAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceEnvironmental engineeringChromatographyIonEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing demand for lithium worldwide requires efficient and sustainable recovery strategies to reduce reliance on resource-intensive primary sources like conventional mining and brine extraction. Secondary sources, such as wastewater from spent lithium-ion batteries and industrial wastewater have emerged as viable alternatives for lithium extraction. This study investigated the concentration polarization (CP) near ion-exchange membranes (IEMs) for selective separation of Li + over K + using the difference in the diffusion coefficient. The smaller diffusion coefficient of Li + (1.03 × 10 −9 m 2 /s) than that of K + (1.96 × 10 −9 m 2 /s) allowed the selective Li + separation in shock electrodialysis (SED). A lab-scale SED reactor was built with two cation-exchange membranes (CEMs) to evaluate the effect of the applied voltage, flow rate, and intermembrane distance on Li + selectivity. A successful Li + selection (up to a 40.8% increase in the Li + concentration) was demonstrated in the effluent of the concentrating boundary layer while the effluent of the diluting boundary layer showed a depletion of Li + (up to a 30.4% decrease in the Li + concentration). Mathematical model simulations of a ternary system (Li + , K + , Cl − ) confirmed the selective Li + separation in SED due to the diffusivity difference. In the model simulations, the Li + selection was substantially affected by the selectivity of CEM, applied voltage and boundary layer thickness. These findings highlight the potential of SED as a scalable and energy-efficient approach for lithium recovery from secondary sources contributing to resource recycling in the circular economy. • Diffusivity-driven separation was demonstrated using shock electrodialysis. • Concentration polarization in electrodialysis was used for selective Li + separation. • Lower diffusivity of Li + resulted in higher concentration in the concentrating boundary layer. • Applied voltage, flow rate, inter-IEM distance governed the separation efficiency in experiments. • In modeling, IEM selectivity, electric current, boundary layer thickness governed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental ManagementSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207