MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413094091 · doi:10.1007/s00401-025-02923-1

A focus on the normal-appearing white and gray matter within the multiple sclerosis brain: a link to smoldering progression

2025· review· en· W4413094091 on OpenAlexaff
Gema Muñoz González, Bert A. ‘t Hart, Marianna Bugiani, Jason R. Plemel, Geert J. Schenk, Gijs Kooij, Antonio Luchicchi

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Neuropathologica · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research Institute
FundersNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekStichting MS Research
KeywordsWhite matterMultiple sclerosisPathologyPathologicalNeuroscienceGray (unit)DiseaseMedicineBiologyMagnetic resonance imagingImmunologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neuro-inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease, traditionally characterized by the presence of focal demyelinating lesions in the CNS. However, accumulating evidence suggests that multiple sclerosis pathophysiology extends beyond such classical lesions, affecting also 'normal' appearing tissue in both white and gray matter, referred to as 'normal-appearing white matter' and 'normal-appearing gray matter', respectively. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the widespread biochemical, cellular, and microstructural alterations occurring in these 'normal-appearing' CNS regions. Additionally, we discuss the evidence derived from human post-mortem studies that support that normal-appearing white and gray matter could be the drivers of smoldering-associated pathological worsening once repair mechanisms are exhausted. Comprehensive understanding of multiple sclerosis pathology beyond classical lesions not only provides a more complete picture of disease progression, but also provides further insights into potential novel therapeutic avenues in order to slow or halt disability accumulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa NeuropathologicaSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207